<a href="http://www.salon.com/2015/07/08/big_oils_decades_of_deception_report_reveals_that_exxons_known_the_truth_about_climate_science_since_decades of udeception: Report reveals that Exxon’s known the truth about climate science since 1981
LINDSAY ABRAMS Follow SKIP TO COMMENTS
<a href="http://www.salon.com/2015/07/08/big_oils_decades_of_deception_report_reveals_that_exxons_known_the_truth_about_climate_science_since_While evaluating the potential impact of developing a gas field it was interested in off Indonesia, ExxonMobil found one major reason for concern: the field in question was 70 percent carbon dioxide. If the field were developed, and that gas vented into the atmosphere, it could become the “largest point source of CO2 in the world,” accounting for a full one percent of climate change-causing emissions.
According to Leonard S. Bernstein, a former chemical engineer at the company, Exxon recognized the potential for global warming concerns to lead to regulations that would impact the project and others like it.
The year was 1981.
The Union of Concerned Scientists has brought to light Bernstein’s claims, which he first made in an email posted online last October, as part of a new report. Called the Climate Deception Dossiers, it uses internal memos to trace the denial and deception practiced by Big Oil over the nearly three decades since 1988, when NASA scientist James Hansen testified before Congress that man-made global warming had begun. And if Bernstein is to believed, then Exxon, at least, knew about it years earlier.
“Whatever their public stance, internally they make very careful assessments of the potential for regulation, including the scientific basis for those regulations,” Bernstein wrote in the email. And while it did question some of the science being floated at the time, he added, “Exxon NEVER denied the potential for humans to impact the climate system.”
VIDEOWATCH: 5 REASONS WHY TRUMP’S OBAMA WIRETAP CLAIMS ARE RIDICULOUS
We can consider that the start of a long-standing pattern. While none of the documents released by UCS are new, taken together they show that the world’s oil giants — ExxonMobil, BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Peabody Energy and Royal Dutch Shell — have been fully aware of their contributions to climate change and the danger that can result, and has at the same time been spending tens of millions to convince the public that that’s not at all the case.
In one more well-known example, experts wrote an internal report for an industry coalition acknowledging that the science of man-made climate change “is well established and cannot be denied.” Yet just three years later, the American Petroleum Institute drafted a strategy to sow misinformation: “Victory will be achieved,” a memo read, when “[a]verage citizens ’understand’ (recognize) uncertainties in climate science; recognition of uncertainties becomes part of the ‘conventional wisdom.’”
Urgent: Honda Airbag Recall – Your airbag could be dangerous
Takata – Airbag Recall
The end result of such public-facing climate denial, of course, has been to allow these companies to continue to pollute the atmosphere. And according to the UCS, more than half of all industrial CO2 emissions have been released since what should have been the watershed year of 1988:
All of this represents more than just shady business practices, argues UCS president Ken Kimmell in a blog post. With its chilling parallels to the strategies used by the tobacco industry to obscure the link between smoking and cancer, the oil industry’s morally corrupt conduct over the past decades should be more than enough for us to revoke its “social license” — there’s no reason for the public, or the government, to assume Big Oil is acting in good faith.
And it’s time, Kimmell contends, for the industry to start earning some of that trust back — not just by ceasing to actively disinform the public and block regulations, but also by taking an active role in working toward solutions. Some have (kind of) started to get on board with that: BP dumped the notorious climate deniers at ALEC; Shell and BP passed shareholder resolutions to factor climate change into the cost of doing business (Exxon and Chevron did not, and Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson decided to stay the course by continuing to question the legitimacy of climate models).
But compared to the deceitful actions these companies have taken in the past, it’s all way too little — and it’s coming decades too late.
Lindsay Abrams is a staff writer at Salon, reporting on all things sustainable. Follow her on Twitter @readingirl, email firstname.lastname@example.org.
MORE LINDSAY ABRARY
Sepa si su auto está en riesgo
Takata – Airbag Recall
Why It’s No Longer Enough to Have a Social Media Strategy
Georgetown University School of Continuing Studies
How Older Men Tighten Their Skin
The Modern Man Today
2017 Solar Rebates Eliminate All Upfront Costs
Energy Bill Cruncher
What A Possible Repeal Of The Estate Tax Means For Your Finances BNY Mellon Wealth Management
Single? See who’s on Match! Match.com
5 Things Most People Don’t Know They’re Eligible for Under Social Security AARP
Bad Behavior: 8 Things Never to Say to a Flight Attendant Orbitz
How To Repair Crepey Skin – The Essential DIY Guide Health Headlines
Million Dollar Empire Formed By Sisters From Ashes Of Million Dollar “No” aspiringnewsies.com
Homeowners Who Haven’t Missed A Payment in 3 Years Must Read This Comparisons.org
5 Ways to Make Money Outside the Stock Market yieldstreet
Love pasta? Show us how you make it yours! Mueller’s Pasta
Find cheap flights for seniors! Yahoo Search
WATCH THIS NEXT
WATCH: Sex sparked Mr. Feeny’s real-life marriage — William Daniels, Bonnie Bartlett reflect on relationship JEREMY BINCKES
WATCH: From virgin vegetarian to sexual cannibal AMANDA MARCOTTE
More troops in Syria: Trump orders boots on the ground to battle ISIS MATTHEW ROZSA
Home | About | Advertising | Contact | Corrections | Help | Investor Relations | Privacy | Terms of Service
Copyright © 2017 Salon Media Group, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited.
SALON ® is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as a trademark of Salon Media Group Inc.
Associated Press articles: Copyright © 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.